<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Postdemocracy</title>
	<link>http://postdemocracy.org</link>
	<description>Theorizing what comes next...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Badiou on Voting</title>
		<link>http://postdemocracy.org/2006/04/14/badiou-on-voting/</link>
		<comments>http://postdemocracy.org/2006/04/14/badiou-on-voting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>micah</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Alain Badiou</category>
	<category>Voting</category>
	<category>Post-Democracy</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postdemocracy.org/2006/04/14/badiou-on-voting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The inspiration for this site was the lack of philosophical reflections on the failures of democracy.  It seemed as if everyone, regardless of political position, blindly accepted the language of &#8216;promoting democracy&#8217; - to such a degree that when the neo-cons hijacked this discourse to justify wars of aggression only feeble attempts were made [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The inspiration for this site was the lack of philosophical reflections on the failures of democracy.  It seemed as if everyone, regardless of political position, blindly accepted the language of &#8216;promoting democracy&#8217; - to such a degree that when the neo-cons hijacked this discourse to justify wars of aggression only feeble attempts were made to distinguish &#8220;our&#8221; democracy from &#8220;their&#8221; democracy.  Of course it didn&#8217;t work, we were still using the same language!</p>
<p>When we say &#8220;democracy&#8221; we often think &#8220;voting&#8221;.  Yet, even after the failure of voting to oust Bush from the Presidency and, more significantly, the failure of voting to offer us a candidate who differed radically from the positions of Bush, we still blindly support voting as the chief tool of carrying out democracy.  Perhaps, then, an attack on voting is a logical first step for the post-democracy project to take.  So it seems appropriate to open this website with an essay by one of the leading living philosophers concerning the mechanism of voting: &#8220;<a href="http://why-war.com/news/2003/01/01/philosop.html">Philosophical considerations of the very singular custom of voting: an analysis based on recent ballots in France</a>&#8221; by <a href="http://www.egs.edu/faculty/badiou.html">Alain Badiou</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://postdemocracy.org/2006/04/14/badiou-on-voting/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
